i387c managing information services and organizations |
||||||||||||
|
Module 1 >> Module 2 >> Module 3 >> Module 4 >> Module 5 Module 4. Unit 1: Organizations and Information
The term "knowledge management" has entered the management literature fairly recently. Unfortunately, as with many new concepts, pinning down a concise, easily understood definition of knowledge management (KM) is a slippery task. CIO, a popular print and Internet-based magazine, advises the newcomer to KM to think of its definition in the broadest of terms.
Information, intellectual, and knowledge capital are now acknowledged as critical resources that must be managed, preserved, and disseminated to support the growth and development of the organization.
Chun Wei Choo reminds us that organizations of all types survive only if they can "adapt swiftly to changing conditions in the environment, to innovate continuously, and to take decisive actions to move their organization toward its goals" (p. xi). Information communication and understanding is the only way accomplish these survival strategies. Because organizations are comprised of people, and people (individually or socially) must make sense of information to plan and implement goals and objectives, make decisions, perform tasks, and generally make sense of their organizations. Choo builds on the work of Karl Weick (social sensemaking) and Brenda Dervin (individual sense-making.) Sensemaking is used as both a theory and a practice. Brenda Dervin, a communications scholar, and Karl Weick, an industrial psychologist, have been leaders in sensemaking research. Weick explains sensemaking as involving both individual and group sensemaking processes and behaviors. The concept is grounded in theories of communication, information, social cognition, and constructivism and can be evidenced in individual and group efforts to understand or grasp a situation or information. During a “sensemaking episode” users try to construct meaning by bridging gaps of understanding between what they experience and their past “image” of a similar experience. Sensemaking begins when the situation is novel and there appears to be a discrepancy between what is expected and what is observed. To make sense, the sensemaker must take some deliberate initiative to understand. For example, networked information users often frequently experience “gaps” in their understanding; sometimes due to network downtime, to unclear interface design, or for other reasons. When users receive an unexpected response to a query, where do they turn? Online help manuals rarely are intuitive and as responsive as a librarian! (Rice-Lively, 2002) Choo outlines the organizational sensemaking process below.
Burke and Tulett (1999) claimed that when the external environment of an organization is stable and the organizational task is routine there is little need for a sophisticated system for information distribution is not necessary. However, when the external environment is unstable and the task is non-routine the level of uncertainty for the organization increases the need for timely, accurate information.
|
||||||||||||
thanks to patrick
williams for template design |
Last update 3
june 2006 |