|
|
 |
Derived and assigned indexing
Due: June 24 @ 5PM via Blackboard
Purpose:
To give you experience in the three major types of indexing: derived,
uncontrolled; assigned, uncontrolled; and assigned from a controlled vocabulary
and their relations to the subject indexing process.
Directions:
Step 1 — Document Analysis
Analyze the attached article (as either image or text file) to establish
its subject matter. You may use whatever approach or method you choose to as
long as you describe and justify the approach or method. Do not write down
the subject of the article at this point -- only the approach or method you
use to establish the subject matter of the document.
Step 2 — Subject Description
Write a subject description of the article’s subject matter. 2-3 sentences
should be enough. (Do not change the subject description as you work through
3, 4, and 5.)
Step 3 — Subject Analysis
Translate the subject description into indexing terms using three different
methods:
- Derive terms from the article that you think best represent the subject
of the article. The terms must be present in the article. Limit the number
of indexing terms to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular
set of terms.
- Assign terms to the article that you think best represent the subject of the
article. The terms could be present in the article or you could come up with
terms that you feel cover the subject better. Limit the number of indexing
terms to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular set of terms.
- Assign terms from the ERIC thesaurus to the article that you think best
represent the subject of the article. Limit the number of indexing terms
to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular set of terms.
There are several copies of the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors in XXXXXX.
Be sure to use the descriptors & not
the cross-references! The online version of the Thesaurus is available in
the UT Libraries databases — just click on the ERIC database and then
the Thesaurus button.
Discussion and analysis
Compare and contrast the terms you chose in Step 3: a, b, and c to the subject
description you wrote in step 2 and to your document analysis in 1 by addressing
issues such as how well each of the three methods in step 3 cover the subject
matter you established in step 2; how well do the each of the three methods
express the subject matter; and do each of the methods stress particular parts
of the subject matter.
Discuss which indexing language expresses the subject matter best and
which indexing language provides the best access to the article for what intended
audience.
NOTE: The discussion and analysis should be no less than 500 words and no more
than 1000 words long.
You will be graded according to the discussion and analysis' clarity, organization,
depth, clarity of evaluative and analytic comments, and the demonstrated understanding
of the issues involved in the subject indexing process and the extent to which
readings are incorporated in the discussion and analysis.
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Points |
|
|
Poor /
Needs Work |
Good |
Excellent |
10 points total |
|
1 |
1.75 |
2.5 |
|
Use of Concepts |
IT concepts are mentioned but not
explored. Student limits use of concepts to buzzwords, or repetition
of class material |
Concepts are not essential to the
student's main points. Student tries to fit in as many concepts
as possible into the paper without necessarily exploring them. |
Concepts are central to the student's
paper. Student shows an ability to use a few concepts to reach new
insights into the topic. |
|
Creative Interpretation
|
Student limits analysis to surface
observations. The essay is based almost entirely on factual description. |
New relationships or connections between
concepts and the topic are explored, but not in depth. |
Student uses IT concepts to explore
unusual relationships or connections that are not obvious. there
is little or no description in the paper. |
|
Organization |
Paper is poorly organized. Student frequently strays
off course or has many irrelevant points. Paper is often indecipherable
or incoherent. |
Introductory paragraph and conclusion contain new
ideas that were not explored in the essay. Student strays off topic
occassionally. |
Organization is clear and logical. The introduction
and conclusion are well-developed and relate strongly to the rest
of the paper. Student does not make any irrelevant points. |
|
Presentation |
Paper reads like a first draft. Has numerous problems
in grammar, word choice, spelling and punctuation. More than 15%
of the sentences are in the passive voice. No consistent citation
style. |
Paper has occasional problems with grammar, word
choice, spelling or punctuation. Between 10 and 15% of the sentences
are in the passive voice. Citation style is consistent. |
Paper does not read like a rough draft. Student
has eliminated all obvious errors in word choice, grammar, spelling,
and punctuation. Less than 10% of the sentences are in the passive
voice. Citation style is consistent and based on an accepted citation
style.
|
|
Last Modified: August 15 2008 10:38:06.
|