School of Information - The University of TexasSkip to content
   search   
About Programs Admissions Courses People Research Computing Careers Kilgarlin
   
INF 384C: Assignments
Immroth Classroom
  Home
  Objectives
  Grading
  Schedule
  Readings
  Resources
 


Search
Contact Info
UT Home

Derived and assigned indexing

Due: June 24 @ 5PM via Blackboard

Purpose:

To give you experience in the three major types of indexing: derived, uncontrolled; assigned, uncontrolled; and assigned from a controlled vocabulary and their relations to the subject indexing process.

Directions:

Step 1 — Document Analysis

Analyze the attached article (as either image or text file) to establish its subject matter. You may use whatever approach or method you choose to as long as you describe and justify the approach or method. Do not write down the subject of the article at this point -- only the approach or method you use to establish the subject matter of the document.

Step 2 — Subject Description

Write a subject description of the article’s subject matter. 2-3 sentences should be enough. (Do not change the subject description as you work through 3, 4, and 5.)

Step 3 — Subject Analysis

Translate the subject description into indexing terms using three different methods:

  1. Derive terms from the article that you think best represent the subject of the article. The terms must be present in the article. Limit the number of indexing terms to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular set of terms.
  2. Assign terms to the article that you think best represent the subject of the article. The terms could be present in the article or you could come up with terms that you feel cover the subject better. Limit the number of indexing terms to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular set of terms.
  3. Assign terms from the ERIC thesaurus to the article that you think best represent the subject of the article. Limit the number of indexing terms to 5 and provide the reasons why you chose that particular set of terms. There are several copies of the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors in XXXXXX. Be sure to use the descriptors & not the cross-references! The online version of the Thesaurus is available in the UT Libraries databases — just click on the ERIC database and then the Thesaurus button.

Discussion and analysis

Compare and contrast the terms you chose in Step 3: a, b, and c to the subject description you wrote in step 2 and to your document analysis in 1 by addressing issues such as how well each of the three methods in step 3 cover the subject matter you established in step 2; how well do the each of the three methods express the subject matter; and do each of the methods stress particular parts of the subject matter.

Discuss which indexing language expresses the subject matter best and which indexing language provides the best access to the article for what intended audience.

NOTE: The discussion and analysis should be no less than 500 words and no more than 1000 words long.

You will be graded according to the discussion and analysis' clarity, organization, depth, clarity of evaluative and analytic comments, and the demonstrated understanding of the issues involved in the subject indexing process and the extent to which readings are incorporated in the discussion and analysis.

Criteria

Evaluation

Points

 

Poor /
Needs Work

Good

Excellent

10 points total

 

1

1.75

2.5

 

Use of Concepts

IT concepts are mentioned but not explored. Student limits use of concepts to buzzwords, or repetition of class material

Concepts are not essential to the student's main points. Student tries to fit in as many concepts as possible into the paper without necessarily exploring them.

Concepts are central to the student's paper. Student shows an ability to use a few concepts to reach new insights into the topic.

 

Creative Interpretation

Student limits analysis to surface observations. The essay is based almost entirely on factual description.

New relationships or connections between concepts and the topic are explored, but not in depth.

Student uses IT concepts to explore unusual relationships or connections that are not obvious. there is little or no description in the paper.

 

Organization

Paper is poorly organized. Student frequently strays off course or has many irrelevant points. Paper is often indecipherable or incoherent.

Introductory paragraph and conclusion contain new ideas that were not explored in the essay. Student strays off topic occassionally.

Organization is clear and logical. The introduction and conclusion are well-developed and relate strongly to the rest of the paper. Student does not make any irrelevant points.

 

Presentation

Paper reads like a first draft. Has numerous problems in grammar, word choice, spelling and punctuation. More than 15% of the sentences are in the passive voice. No consistent citation style.

Paper has occasional problems with grammar, word choice, spelling or punctuation. Between 10 and 15% of the sentences are in the passive voice. Citation style is consistent.

Paper does not read like a rough draft. Student has eliminated all obvious errors in word choice, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Less than 10% of the sentences are in the passive voice. Citation style is consistent and based on an accepted citation style.

 

 




Last Modified: August 15 2008 10:38:06.




© 2001 - 2006 University of Texas at Austin - School of Information